The emails we sent were about the fraudulent £4.1 million proof of debt made by Julian Gill of Womble Bond Dickinson who’s instructed barrister admitted categorically, just 24-days prior that “For the purpose of the Energy Supply Agreement, Force Majeure has effect”, therefore proving beyond reasonable doubt that they all knew, on 9th January 2017, on that ground alone, that the claims they were making were blatantly false.
It is proven beyond reasonable doubt therefore that Womble Bond Dickinson, Middlesbrough FC and Ulick Staunton, their instructed counsel, knew the representation they made was false, and that therefore they knew what they were doing was dishonest, as they did the first and second fraudulent claims.
The £4.1 million proof of debt claim was made to defraud creditors of the proven damages claim against Middlesbrough FC exceeding £18.7 million
The offenders knew they were safe, because the lawless criminals in central government and the corrupt regulators, police and courts they control would cover up for them anyway, they all did precisely that.
The first claim made by Middlesbrough FC was in the sum of £256,269.89 of which £181,269.89 was for energy supply. It was that claim, which was already found to be false by Nugee J on 5th February 2018, which Geoffrey Vos lied about to conceal the fraud, stating in his judgment of 8th February 2019 that the claim used to forfeit the lease was a “quantified claim for rent“. The second fraudulent claim was for £541,308.89 of which £466,308.89 was for energy supply and this email was about the third, exceeding £4.1 million.
Recipient: dominic.raab.mp@parliament.uk
Subject: A-2021-0089 --- The fraudulent £4.1 million proof of debt
Sent: Nov 11, 2021, 2:38:45 AM
Read: 1 time on Nov 11, 2021 at 10:41:20 AM We sent the same email we sent to City of London Police, also to the Lord Chancellor, Dominic Raab and to the Court of Appeal. All sought to cover up the fraud to assist the offenders.
Recipient: Angela.McLaren@city-of-london.police.uk
Subject: A-2021-0089 - Corruption & perversion of the course of justice - FAO Judge Prince
Sent: Oct 20, 2021, 2:32:04 PM
Last read: Nov 11, 2021, 7:40:53 AM
Read: 61 times The same email we sent a day prior to the Court of Appeal was read 38 times, before William Davis LJ, acting under orders given by the corrupt head of the UK civil justice system, Sir Geoffrey Vos, disposed of the appeal on 11th November 2021 (perverting the course of justice).
Is it any co-incidence that it was on 11th November 2021 that the corrupt Court of Appeal refused the permission to appeal whilst deliberately evading the directions concerning those three emails (this one, Email-A & Email-B) on the day that Younger became involved in suppressing the police investigation? We think not. Inter-agency collusion is the order of the day in the corrupt UK.
It was precisely 1-year to that day Fancourt, a fellow corrupt Jewish freemason judge did precisely the same, concealing proven fraud and criminal property with his void General civil restraint order (false instruments as defined in the Forgery & Counterfeiting Act 1981). This is the preferred corrupt practice used by the UK’s politically controlled judiciary of fraudsters and human rights abusing tyrants. They defraud, then when they have finished, they conceal, perverting the course of justice (preventing justice being served on themselves and others deploying void, false instrument restraint orders.
Whenever an application for permission to bring proceedings under the restraint order is made, permission is always refused, one’s right to a fair trial, or any trial at all, is consistently suppressed. The politically controlled criminals in judicial office have certified the proven case as “no more or less than bound to fail” even though a judge of the same court found the case to be proven.
Recipient: Civil Appeals - CMSC
Subject: C1/2021/1614 - The fraudulent £4.1 million proof of debt
Sent: Nov 10, 2021, 9:20:00 AM
Last read: Nov 11, 2021, 10:44:34 AM
Read: 38 timesThe email we sent to the corrupt police and courts setting out the obvious and proven fraud
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: Intelligence UK International
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 02:38
Subject: A-2021-0089 — The fraudulent £4.1 million proof of debt
To: <dominic.raab.mp@parliament.uk>
Dear Sir / Madam,
1. I refer to the proof of debt fraud by false representation (S2 Fraud Act 2006): Proof_of_Debt_highlighted_11_04_2020
2. You will note that £4,036,874,75 of the fraudulent claim is for energy supply. In case you are slow to catch on that Nugee J already found my case to be proven on 5th February 2018, the answer is here, read it carefully and watch the 1.minute 30 second video: THE ENERGY SUPPPLY AGREEMENT IS CONDITIONAL.
The fraudulent proof of debt claim form has a penal notice on it – a criminal offence
3. The proof of debt form that Gill used to submit the fraudulent claim has a penal notice on it. Here is a link to the rule 14.4 IR 2016 proof of debt form that Gill made his fraudulent claim on. The link goes through to the .Gov website. I quote from the proof of debt form:
The information you provide in your completed proof of debt must be true and accurate to the best of your information, knowledge and belief. If you fail to do so, you may be committing a criminal offence for which you could be prosecuted.
Julian Gill removed the penal notice from the standard 14.4 proof of debt form before he committed his fraud
4. Why do you think Gill removed the penal notice from the proof of debt form? I am asking you, I already know the answer, I know all the answers, I compiled the terms of the Energy Supply Agreement to start with. I am a shrewd businessman, I am not going to agree to supply them a single penny until my turbine is operational and generating money. It was for that reason I made it conditional.
I do hope this makes the position clear. The conduct proves my contention, that the UK justice system is rotten to the core, a complete joke and a sham.
The idiotic corrupt clowns in the lower courts (including Vos) have sustained this blatantly fraudulent claim to defraud my fellow creditors and I, working to assist the offenders in doing so. Vos now sits as head of civil justice.
HHJ Prince of Newcastle Crown Court is seeking to do the same as district judges Michael Fanning and Paul Currer did in the Magistrates, concealing the proven, multiple indictable only offences. All act under orders of the Tory kleptocracy.
Yours faithfully,
Paul Millinder
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Once they have finished defrauding and perverting the course of justice in breach of their judicial oaths, they are promoted, effectually bribed with pay rises, to Lord Justices of Appeal or other promotions.
They are bribed by you, courtesy of taxpayer’s funds, for breaching their oaths and committing criminal offences in judicial office. The Promissory Oaths Act 1868 is law today, law that is designed to protect civilians from this kind of tyranny. Under this government kleptocracy of liars, cheats and white-collar criminals, the law serves no purpose.
Open the tower