Intelligence UK Investigations tackles judicial fraud and corruption head on. We take action against the otherwise unaccountable and unregulated, in the public interest, in the interests of justice.
Intelligence UK Investigations is here to maintain just governance and long-established English constitutional principles. We do this by waging war against an increasingly corrupt administration, taking direct action in contentious and often complex cases, and action against the government apparatus.
We encourage the public to engage with us and join the remote hearings. ‘Justice must not only be done, but it must be seen to be done‘.
(CASE 1) Intelligence UK Investigations Ltd v the Official Receiver of London, Insolvency Service, Middlesbrough Football Club, His Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service & the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for justice
In March 2022 IUK acquired the rights of action from Paul Millinder, a wind farm developer who had two companies put into liquidation after the system allegedly colluded to prevent justice being served on the Tory politician’s Club, Middlesbrough FC.
Mr Millinder was branded a ‘vexatious litigant‘ by the corrupt English establishment who acted to defraud him of over 10 million by dishonestly depriving him of the mandatory law of due process when the rule was engaged, the rule known as insolvency set off / 14.25 of the Insolvency Rules 2016.
The case entails important points of law: Insolvency set off and the anti-deprivation principle, as it does the gross abuse inflicted on those who have been wronged, denying remedy, two-tier justice and human rights abuse by unlawful deprivation of assets and misuse of the law on restraint orders deployed to conceal fraud and wrongdoings.
The case highlights the fact that there is no judicial independence and when third party interference strikes, no one is safe, for nobody can rely on the protections and rights granted by statutory law, and no one can rely on the strength of completed contractual terms to gain restitution.
21 ‘judges’ of the senior courts of England and Wales, are alleged to have colluded to conceal the crucial facts and evidence, and the completed contractual terms of the originating deeds said to have been breached.
The value of the claim exceeds £25 million.
UPDATE OF 1 NOVEMBER 2025
Trial of the Claimant’s case in the High Court of Chancery – Insolvency & Companies Court is listed all day on 9 February 2026. We will report once proceedings are concluded.
We are awaiting a listing date from the King’s Bench Division hearing our application for stand-alone declaratory relief in relation to the doctrine of witness immunity.
(CASE 2) An Englishman’s home is no longer his castle
An extraordinary case is being pursued in the High Court Chancery Division by Perseus Ventures Limited in the B.V.I.
IUKI investigated the judicial officers involved who appear to have concealed the crucial evidence and facts and it is the same players as those involved in Case 1 who appear to have been installed into this case to do the same.
The case calls into question crucial points of law in the public interest. The first, entails potentially setting a dangerous new national precedent, that an ‘Englishman’s home is no longer his castle’.
The second, is the right to rely on the important rule of finality / res judicata, which has been defeated in this case by ‘judges’ who appear to have made the right to rely on the rule, selective.
Citation:
“If it was not a written requirement by law that any interest in land must be established by writing, no Englishman’s home is his castle, for any other man down the pub could do what D2 has done, and say, “it’s mine, he gave it to me over the phone”, even though that man didn’t in fact own the property he was giving. Even if he did own the property he was giving, no property would truly be his, because any man could lie and say “he gave me it over the phone”, and claim it for his own. ‘Instruments required to be in writing‘ at Section 53(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925 provides that safeguard, over a man’s property”
– Intelligence UK Investigations
UPDATE OF 1 NOVEMBER 2025
There is a hearing listed at 10.30AM in the Rolls Building before Mr Justice Leech.
We will report fully on the case once final judgment is handed down.
(Case 3) – Receivers who do not receive then charge fees as if they have – leveraged against security by Barclays Bank PLC / Barclays Bank UK PLC
It is our view that many of the UK’s judges are acting as ‘agents’ for the likes of these LPA Receivers and corrupt lawyers and corporations they represent, making gains and causing loss by acting in genuine bias and concealing the crucial points at issue that needed judging on.
This case provides the classic example whereby the the contractual terms of the LPA Receivers, obligating them to have collected ‘all rent and income derived from the Property’ was concealed, with Judge Freedman (Mr Justice Freedman of the King’s Bench) evidenced to have been lying in his interim judgment, saying there was an ‘unestablished breach with unestablished consequences’.
IMPORTANT POINTS OF PUBLIC INTEREST – ABUSE OF THE LAW ON CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDERS TO CONCEAL THE SUBSTANCE OF LITIGATON
This case calls into question important points of law in respect of fiduciary duties of the LPA Receiver, and as it does, the widespread abuse we have witnessed being inflicted on UK civilians and their businesses by corrupt members of the judiciary who fraudulently fail to judge on crucial facts and evidence, then act contrary to the final public policy decisions on the issue of ‘TWM’ established by the Court of Appeal, certifying often well proven cases as ‘no more or less than bound to fail’ grossly violating ones right to a fair and unbiased trial and often conveying acts that are intended to, and which do, pervert the course of civil justice in consequence by the nature of those acts.
UPDATE OF 1 NOVEMBER 2025
We are waiting the listing of 2 outstanding applications for declaratory relief and to set aside orders alleged to have been founded by judicial fraud in failing to address the Claimant’s preliminary issue, the contractual terms and the consequential breach, being the loss suffered by Perseus Ventures Limited as a result of that breach; the rent and income the receivers failed to receive.
Have you got a case for us to look at?
If you or anyone you know has a case involving alleged judicial fraud and or corruption, we are always on the look out for cases to consider taking on in the public interest in furtherance of our case in clearing out the corrupt and restoring just governance. Simply complete our form below and we’ll be in touch:
