Intelligence UK Investigations tackles judicial fraud and corruption head on. We take action against the otherwise unaccountable and unregulated, in the public interest, in the interests of justice.
Intelligence UK Investigations is here to maintain just governance and long-established English constitutional principles. We do this by waging war against an increasingly corrupt administration, taking direct action in contentious and often complex cases.
We encourage the public to engage with us and join the remote hearings. ‘Justice must not only be done, but it must be seen to be done‘.
(CASE 1) Intelligence UK Investigations Ltd v the Official Receiver of London, Insolvency Service, Middlesbrough Football Club, His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service & the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for justice
In March 2022 IUK acquired the rights of action from Paul Millinder, a wind farm developer who had two companies put into liquidation after the system allegedly colluded to prevent justice being served on the Tory politician’s Club, Middlesbrough FC.
Mr Millinder was branded a ‘vexatious litigant‘ by the corrupt English establishment who acted to defraud him of over 10 million by dishonestly depriving him of the mandatory law of due process when the rule was engaged, the rule known as insolvency set off / 14.25 of the Insolvency Rules 2016.
The case entails important points of law: Insolvency set off and the anti-deprivation principle.
The case highlights the fact that there is no judicial independence and when third party interference strikes, no one is safe, for nobody can rely on the protections and rights granted by statutory law, and no one can rely on the strength of completed contractual terms to gain restitution.
21 ‘judges’ of the senior courts of England and Wales, are alleged to have colluded to conceal the crucial facts and evidence, and the completed contractual terms of the originating deeds said to have been breached.
The value of the claim exceeds £25 million.
(CASE 2) An Englishman’s home is no longer his castle?
An extraordinary case is being pursued in the High Court Chancery Division by Perseus Ventures Limited in the B.V.I. We investigated the judicial officers involved who appear to have concealed the crucial evidence and facts and it is the same players as those involved in Case 1 who appear to have been installed into this case to do the same.
The case calls into question crucial points of law in the public interest. The first, entails potentially setting a dangerous new national precedent, that an Englishman’s home is no longer his castle. The second, is the right to rely on the important rule of finality / res judicata, which has been defeated in this case by ‘judges’ who appear to have made the right to rely on the rule, selective.
Citation:
“If it was not a written requirement by law that any interest in land must be established by writing, no Englishman’s home is his castle, for any other man down the pub could do what D2 has done, and say, “it’s mine, he gave it to me over the phone”, even though that man didn’t in fact own the property he was giving. Even if he did own the property he was giving, no property would truly be his, because any man could lie and say “he gave me it over the phone”, and claim it for his own.
‘Instruments required to be in writing‘ at Section 53(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925 provides that safeguard, over a man’s property”
– Intelligence UK Investigations
We will report fully on the case once final judgment is handed down.