Lords of fraud: Intelligence UK International exposes how the UK’s corrupt, politically controlled judiciary act lawlessly to defraud innocent parties who come to the courts to seek justice. Sir Geoffrey Vos, AKA, Geoffrey Charles Vos of Netherley Hall Estate, Malvern, the Master of the Rolls, head of the UK’s civil justice system is the penultimate Lord of fraud. Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls.
Sir Geoffrey Vos – the Master of the Rolls is a taxpayer funded criminal racketeering fraudster and an oath violating imposter
On 31st July 2020 Sir Geoffrey Vos was appointed as Master of the Rolls by the Queen. The Master of the Rolls is head of civil justice and the UK’s second highest ranking Judge, with the first being the Lord Chief Justice, Ian Burnett of Maldon. You would think he would lead by example, exuding outstanding knowledge of the law, integrity and advocation of impartiality at the highest level to match his annual salary of £214,165, paid by the taxpayer. On the contrary.
Under Boris Johnson’s kleptocracy, the United Kingdom has become a rogue state, the administration of justice lacks impartiality and there is no separation of powers between the courts and central government. Sir Geoffrey Vos. Master of the Rolls.
One prime example as to how these criminal racketeering fraudsters installed by the Crown to act against the people is how Sir Geoffrey Vos affronted the long-established doctrine on no res judicata in insolvency proceedings.
In Re Fraser, ex parte Central Bank of London [1892] 2 QB 633, CA Lord Justice Kay said:
“It is old law in bankruptcy that, neither upon an attempt to prove a debt, nor upon a petition for an adjudication of bankruptcy or a receiving order against a debtor, is a judgment against him for the debt conclusive. In Ex parte Bryant (1), Lord Eldon said: ” Proof upon a judgment will not stand merely upon that, if there is not a debt due in ‘ truth and reality,’ for which the consideration must be looked to.” Can this judgment be treated as conclusive in bankruptcy because the debtor has unsuccessfully attempted to set it aside ? I think not and I cannot see how the matter is any more res judicata because there has been an unsuccessful appeal to this Court. I agree in all that the Master of the Rolls has said on this point.
Fraser was a judgment debtor, who had exhaustively challenged the imposition of a judgment debt upon him, but without success. Fraser’s application to set aside the judgment debt had failed before a Master (twice), Judge (once), Divisional Court (once) and Court of Appeal (once), yet this presented no bar in the bankruptcy Court.
Sir Geoffrey Vos defeated law established since the early 18th century to assist the offenders in using the courts to defraud
At paragraph 100 of his predetermined judgment where he failed to try the fraud the application specifically sought to try, whilst asking Vos to exercise his duty of inquiry in the insolvency court by removing the £4.1 million fraudulent claim used to defraud creditors, the now Master of the Rolls said this:
“100. As I have already made clear, the circumstances in which a court can set aside or even investigate, the correctness of orders, save in the context of properly constituted appeals, are very strictly limited. Our courts rightly set great store by the finality of the orders that are made after argument. The option for taking two bites at the cherry are limited indeed“
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls played a lead role in an aggravated conspiracy to defraud in the name of justice
Sir Geoffrey Vos has been impairing law established since the 18th century, turning from independent referee of the match to striker for Middlesbrough FC, making up for what they lack on the pitch with misconduct of the rules and foul play to ensure the ball was always in their court.
All UK judges must take a solemn oath, swearing to act “without fear or favour, affection or ill-will”.
Intelligence UK was shown irrefutable evidence that Sir Geoffrey Vos had breached his oath, acting with favour and ill-will, concealing fraud committed by dishonest lawyers, favouring one side and assisting an offender, knowing of the fraud committed.
The constitutional oath of the judiciary was implemented in 1868. Known as the Promissory Oaths Act, this law is designed to protect civilians from abuse of powers and to ensure that justice is administered fairly and impartially.
Bizarrely, we found after investigation that this law that is never enforced. Judges that breach their oaths in the UK are never brought to justice, they are free to continue in office, completely unregulated. England’s judges have become lawless, a law unto themselves.
Sir Geoffrey Vos the Master of the Rolls was concealing proven fraud
In the case of Millinder v Middlesbrough Football & Athletic Company (1986) Ltd we were shown the application notice made by Mr Millinder when Sir Geoffrey Vos was Chancellor of the High Court. The application notice asked the court for a fraud trial.
Page 3, paragraph 5 through to paragraph 7 of Mr Millinder’s application notice referred to a finding by Mr Justice Nugee, a judge of the same court when on 5th February 2018 the Judge found that no money was owed to Middlesbrough FC.
Paragraph 6 of the application notice referred to “collateral estoppel” applying, as Mr Millinder’s central argument had been tried and proven by Mr Justice Nugee.
Paragraph 7 referred to the fraudulent claim of £4,031,664.80, stating that:
The Energy Supply Agreement is a conditional contract, subject to (full satisfaction of) the conditions precedent set out in Clause 2.
Those conditions encompassed full satisfaction of (by Tenant), the Connection Agreement and, Commissioning of the wind turbine. Middlesbrough Football Club {Landlord) refused to complete the Agreement (Exhibit 3) with Northern Powergrid, the Distribution Network Operator in February 2015 so that the connection for the wind turbine could be established.
Condition 2.1 of the Energy Supply Agreement could not be fulfilled due to actions of the Landlord in refusing that connection to customer owned substation assets.
The actions of the Landlord caused substantial losses to the Claimant, resulting in the insolvency of its subsidiary. The Start Date of the Energy Supply Agreement is the date upon which the conditions precedent in Clause 2 are satisfied. There was no Start Date, due to the actions of the Landlord in preventing the same connection from being established and therefore the Claimant asserts that the proof of debt, submitted to the Official Receiver is a false misrepresentation”.
The application that came before Sir Geoffrey Vos asked him to set aside the false proof of debt claim which was found to have been false by Mr Justice Nugee on 5th February 2018. Anyone reading the application notice (particularly the parts in bold we highlighted), could determine that no money was owed.
Paragraph 8 of the application notice referred again to the same judgment of Mr Justice Nugee on 5th February 2018 where he found that Middlesbrough FC had unlawfully forfeited the Lease and that no rent or energy supply payment was owed.
“A quantified claim for rent” – knowing that neither rent or energy supply could possibly be owed
At paragraph 105 of his judgment, Sir Geoffrey Vos said this:
“On 25th June 2015, Middlesbrough invoiced Empowering Wind MFC for a quantified claim for rent in the sum of £256,269.89.“
Sir Geoffrey Vos
£181,269.89 of the false claim, was for energy supply. Sir Geoffrey Vos knew that no rent was owed and that there was no “entitlement to agreed output” and that any “invoicing & payment” was contractually prohibited.
Sir Geoffrey Vos lied, acting with ill-will to conceal the fact that Middlesbrough FC unlawfully forfeited the Lease, undermining the previous finding of Nugee J, covering up the £4.1 million claim that the application specifically asked him to deal with.
Sir Geoffrey Vos had before him proof that Middlesbrough FC’s barrister had retracted the claims
Disturbingly, we were shown an excerpt from the barrister, Mr Staunton’s skeleton, who was acting for Middlesbrough FC for the hearing that came before Sir Geoffrey Vos. The excerpt (page 12 of his skeleton) below contains that admission.
The application that came before Sir Geoffrey Vos on 8th February 2019 asked him to try the fraud, the claim, exceeding £4.1 million that Mr Justice Nugee had already found to be false, whilst Middlesbrough FC’s own barrister also retracted the claim. Master of the Rolls
Sir Geoffrey Vos asked Staunton, counsel for MFC to retract and replace his skeleton after finding he “U-turned” on MFC’s claims
Even more disturbingly, we were shown an email to the clerk to Sir Geoffrey Vos and to the clerk to Mr Justice Arnold (now Lord Justice Arnold) dated 30th November 2018. The email listed the false claims brought by Middlesbrough FC and Mr Staunton and referred to the fact that Mr Staunton had retracted the claims on 12th November 2018 in that skeleton.
Shortly after receiving that email, Sir Geoffrey Vos asked Mr Staunton to retract and replace his skeleton of 12th November 2018, less his admission that he retracted the claims.
At paragraph 103 of his judgment, Sir Geoffrey Vos said this:
“I can say at once that I have been through all the papers in this case in meticulous detail, and I have seen no evidence of any kind for any of the allegations of fraud, conspiracy or misdealing that Mr Millinder has made”
Sir Geoffrey Vos
We were shown a note of hearing, which was an ex-parte (without notice) hearing by Middlesbrough FC dated 9th January 2017 and in that note of hearing, Mr Staunton himself had admitted that no claims could be established because, “Force Majeure” had effect.
It was proven therefore that all along, from 9th January 2017 that Mr Staunton, his client, Middlesbrough FC and his instructing solicitors, Womble Bond Dickinson, knew the claims they were making were false. They knew what they were doing was dishonest and the claims are a fraud.
Sir Geoffrey Vos was served a cross examination by Mr Millinder asking why he lied and concealed the fraud Vos replied “no comment”
We were also shown the full cross examination document presented to Sir Geoffrey Vos by Mr Millinder on 14th March 2021.
The excerpt below from that cross examination refers to the salient questions around the false statements Sir Geoffrey Vos made to conceal the fraudulent claims.
Sir Geoffrey Vos knew that the energy supply agreement was conditional and that the first installment of rent (£15,000) was not payable until 17th September 2015.
Sir Geoffrey Vos knew that Middlesbrough FC unlawfully forfeited on 19th August 2015, but yet he was still brazen enough to lie in his own judgment by stating that the fraudulent claim in the sum of £256,269.89 was a “quantified claim for rent”, whist concealing the claim for over £4.1 million which was from the same source as the first. What about the claim in the middle for £541,308.89?
Mr Millinder phoned the Master of the Rolls office asking for “accountability” – The 5-minute recording
Sir Geoffrey Vos, the head of the UK’s civil justice system, the second highest Judge in the country, is proven to have been concealing fraud to assist dishonest lawyers in using the courts to defraud and evade justice.
If the second highest judge in the country, responsible for the entire civil justice system is proven to have behaved in this way, what are the rest of them doing?
We asked Sir Geoffrey Vos to comment, but his response was “no comment”
Help us to help you. Like, comment and share this article far and wide. There’s a cure for corruption and that is, transparency. Knowledge is power.
