Judicial fraud corruption and lack of judicial independence

Our open letter to Baroness Hodge, the Prime Minister’s anti-corruption champion, setting out the major issue she faces, one of systemic corruption of government and the judiciary:

From: Martin Walsh 
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 at 06:33
Subject: Complaint of serious judicial fraud and central government corruption – To Baroness Hodge

In the public interest: Judicial fraud and corruption and lack of judicial independence

Dear Baroness Hodge,

You may be aware that my Firm has taken the Government (Insolvency Service, Lord Chancellor and HMCTS) to court for failing to administer the law and justice.  (See: Intelligence UK Investigations Ltd v Lord Chancellor & ors)

I write to you pursuant to your role as the Prime Minister’s anti-corruption champion.  I number the paragraphs in this open letter which I ask that you respond to.  This letter, sent to you today by email (and to No.10 Private Office and Ministerial Correspondence) will be published via our website.   

A.  ‘Justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done’ – It is seen not being done, and nothing is done: 

1.  The UK’s judiciary is lawless, unregulated and unaccountable:   The JCIO is a sham entity with deliberate non-regulation so that the day-to-day judicial misconduct remains completely unregulated.  Police have been told to send those who complain that a judge has committed an offence, back to the JCIO, who specifically state they do not investigate allegations of fraud or criminality and that any such reports should be made to police.  

B.  ‘Lawmakers cannot be law breakers‘  (The quote by Sir Keir Starmer MP) 

2. Those responsible for the judiciary, the Prime Minister, Lord Chancellor, Lady Chief Justice, and the heads of the judiciary themselves are law breakers.  Section 3(1) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 confers a fiduciary and public interest legal duty on those officers to maintain judicial independence.  There is no judicial independence in any of the high profile unrelated fraud and corruption cases this Firm brought to the courts.   There is systemic corruption and there are third party orders given to conceal the preliminary issue in all 4 cases, by the heads of the judiciary who are themselves implicated. 

C.  ‘Blatant lies and fraudulent concealment’ of evidence and fact by senior judges:

3. Throughout the Millinder case acquired by this Firm, senior judges are evidenced on the official judgments and transcripts making knowingly false statements in material particulars to conceal important facts and circumstances.    A classic example of this conduct, is knowing that the rent on the said lease was £50,000 p.a, and that the rent in Schedule 7 was payable on a quarterly basis, Arnold J (now LJ), said this at p.3 of this 9 January 2017 judgment (I bold highlight underline for emphasis):

“3 The background to the matter, in summary, is as follows. On 17 June 2013 the applicant granted Empowering Wind a lease on payment of a premium of £200,000 under which Empowering Wind was liable to pay rent of £550,000 per annum. There was a planning aspect to the matter which I do not propose to go into in any detail, but the upshot was that it was not until December 2014 that Empowering Wind obtained planning permission from the local planning authority. Empowering Wind paid the rents due under the lease up to June 2015, but thereafter failed to pay the rent. On 19 August 2015 the applicant forfeited the lease.”

3.1.  Arnold J knew the rent in Schedule 7 which he was taken to my Mr Staunton, counsel for the Club was £50,000 payable in quarterly installments.  Therefore, if he did believe what he was saying was true, that EW paid the rent up until June 2015, he would know that the next installment of rent was for £15,000 including V.A.T payable in September 2015, and therefore it is proven Arnold J knew that no rent was owed to D4 at all in August 2015. 

3.2.  On 5 February 2018 Nugee J found that no rent or energy supply was owed when D4 demanded £181,269.89 for energy supply and £75,000 rent on 25 June 2015.  On 9 January 2017 Arnold J was lying and saying the rent was £550,000 per annum to conceal D4’s fraudulent claim made on 20 December 2016 for £541,308.89, knowing that no rent was owed; 

3.3. On 8 February 2019, Vos C, now the Master of the Rolls, head of civil justice for England and Wales, lied at p.103 and 105 of his judgment, knowing that there is fraud and criminal cross over offending in this case, and that no money was contractually owed to D4 by ether EW or EEI, when he falsely stated this: 

“103. I can say at once that I have been through all the papers in this case in meticulous detail, and I have seen no evidence of any kind for any of the allegations of fraud, conspiracy or misdealing that Mr Millinder has made””105. On 25th June 2015, Middlesbrough invoiced Empowering Wind MFC for a quantified claim for rent in the sum of £256,269.89“

– When Vos C knew that £181,269.89 was an invoice for energy supply that D4 were contractually prohibited from invoicing for, and £75,000 was for rent that was not contractually due. 

Can you please respond properly and explain to me what gives these senior judges a mandate to lie, cheat and defraud people in the name of justice like they do? and what you propose to do about it when the courts are so corrupt that people cannot rely on the terms of a contract or the rights granted by statutory rules, to gain remedy for wrongdoings and when layers of judges are then installed to cover up, one after another?    

Two-tier justice, fraud, lawlessness and injustice prevails. 

I await a proper response from you and I thank you in advance.  

Yours sincerely,

Martin Walsh

INTELLIGENCE UK INVESTIGATIONS LTD