Intelligence UK has investigated a multitude judicial corruption and impropriety cases over the last 4-years. We conclude, the UK’s justice system is not doing justice. It is our learned view that the leadership lack integrity and therefore the rules are bent and the rule of law is being diminished. Thousands are being defrauded and deprived of the right to a fair trial in the hands of unethical judges, many of whom are, in reality, not judges at all. Corrupt judges.
Corrupt Judges: Intentionally deceptive action intended to procure unlawful gain
Fraud, whilst infinite in variety, comprises intentionally deceptive actions intended to procure unlawful gain or to deprive of a right that one is otherwise entitled. The activity can be perpetrated by one person, or, as is the case here, by many of the judicial establishment under the control of the Lord Chancellor and his ministerial department, the Ministry of Justice.
Fraudulent activity entails deceit, with the intent of illegally or unethically gaining at the expense of another, often involving the false representation of facts, whether by misrepresenting the true factual position, intentionally withholding material information, providing false statements, or claiming to be credited with accomplishments or qualities on fictitious terms. The latter applies to many of the UK’s judges, purporting to administer the rule of law, with honour, fairness and independence.
How can one administer the rule of law when they knowingly break the laws themselves, often twisting and manipulating the laws to suit their own sinister motives in favour of one party?
We need your help – Lobby your MP to have corrupt judges removed
We need your help with this one people, we are going to petition Parliament and the Crown to exercise their powers and sack all these oath breaking judges with immediate effect, in the interests of justice, for the good of our country and our future generations. We ask a favour, please take our template letter, modify it and send it to your MP, ideally both by email and in hard copy.
Judicial hall of shame – Judges who have acted with favour and ill-will
Judges who breach their oaths, acting with favour and ill-will, a re not judges, they have no jurisdiction to preside over your case, or any case. Any order these tyrants and outcasts make, are void from the outset.
Just because the corrupt UK establishment retain them in office, diminishing the rule of law that is designed to regulate how judges are supposed to behave, does not alleviate the fact that they have breached their oaths. They are afforded no protection by virtue of judicial immunity, for in law, and in truth and reality they are not judges.
- The Lord Chief Justice, Ian Burnett of Maldon
- The Master of the Rolls, Geoffrey Vos
- Lord Justice Christopher Nugee
- Lord Justice Richard Arnold
- Lord Justice Colin Rimer
- His Honour Philip Mark Pelling
- Mr Justice Edward Murray
- Chief Registrar Nicholas Norman Briggs
- Mr Justice Robert John Miles
- Mr Justice Richard Andrew Snowden (promoted to Court of Appeal)
- Deputy Chief Magistrate Tanweer Ikram
- Mr Justice Marcus Smith
- Mr Justice Timothy Miles Fancourt
- District Judge Michael Fanning
- District Judge Paul Currer
- Registrar / ICCJ Clive Hugh Jones (no picture) of the Rolls Building
- His Honour Christopher John Prince
- Mr Justice Jonathan Swift (Administrative Court)
- Lady Justice Geraldine Andrews (Court of Appeal)
- District Judge Myles Watkins (Bristol Combined Court Centre)
- His Honour Martin Alan Gordon Dancey (Designated Family Judge for Dorset)
- Lord Justice William Easthope Davis (Court of Appeal)
Judges that act with favour and ill-will are a fraud
Many of the UK’s judges are acting with favour and ill-will, making gains for those they favour, colluding with magic circle law firms, using the courts as cash cows, serving injustice and maltreating their victims. Thousands of innocent victims are being mentally tortured, abused and hoodwinked out of their right to a fair, unbiased trial whilst being dispossessed of their rights as a civilian in law. The perpetrators are, without question, a fraud, cheating the people, duped into belief they will find justice in the courts, only to be hit with more injustice.
Judicial corruption: The terrorists operating from within
These terrorists have “blood on their hands“, causing more deaths by suicide, family break ups, loss of business, homelessness and loss of quality of life than all the Islamic State terrorists on British soil combined. They are harbored by the political establishment, funded by the public purse, paid well in excess of £120,000, per year, whilst they deliberately fail to do justice. Judicial corruption.
Law is designed to protect civilians from this tyranny – it’s not working
The Promissory Oaths Act 1868 is law today, law that is sworn to be upheld by all those taking up judicial office. The judicial oath is of paramount importance in defending the constitutional principles that underpin any democratic state. One must be able to rely on the courts and the judges within them to administer the law and justice impartially and independently, for without, no business or individual is safe. All citizens must have confidence that cases will be decided fairly, according to law, but in the UK, the reality is, one cannot.
The historical foundation and all time constitutional importance of the judicial oath
The seeds of the UK justice system were first sown by Henry II in 1154 through to 1189, establishing a jury of 12 local knights to settle disputes over the ownership of land. When Henry came to the throne, there were just 18 judges across the whole of the Kingdom, in contrast with over 40,000 today.
By the middle of the 13th century, knights had begun to join clerics on the bench. The first professional judges were appointed from the order of “serjents-at-law”. These were advocates who practiced in the Court of Common Pleas. Lawrence de Brok, a serjeant, became a judge in 1268, started the tradition, which lasted until 1875, of serjeants being the group from which judges were chosen. This was an important milestone in the evolution of modern justice, because it meant that the judiciary had real professional experience of the law before moving on to the bench. Over the years, serjeants were overtaken in popularity by barristers and solicitors.
During the 13th century the judiciary, instances of bribery were common and judges were regularly and openly accused of corruption. It was this flaw in the system that first led to the evolution of the oath. By 1346, all judges were obliged to swear that;
“I would in no way accept gift or reward from any party in litigation before them or give advice to any man, great or small, in any action to which the King was a party himself”
Even then, as is is the position today, that did not always curb the problem of judges being influenced by 3rd parties. In 1350, the Chief Justice of the King’s Bench, William de Thorpe, was sentenced to death for bribery. Thorpe accumulated great estates, particularly in Lincolnshire and it was said that his vast wealth was derived primarily from bribes. Thorpe was condemned to hanging and confiscation of all property. Bizarrely, by 1351, however, he was pardoned. In the subsequent year he was made baron of the exchequer. Whether that pardon was a result of political affiliations and favours is unknown, but highly likely.
In 1387, six judges advised King Richard II that a parliamentary commission set up to limit his own powers was ‘invalid and traitorous’. They were all impeached, convicted and sentenced to death, although only one was actually executed; the rest were banished to Ireland. There’s a long tradition of judges “looking after one another”, but more so today. Unsurprisingly, for two centuries after this the judiciary kept almost entirely away from politics.
Moving away from politics
During the turbulent 15th century, “the Wars of the Roses“, judges stood apart from both the Houses of Lancaster and York, and were largely unaffected by the changes in government. From 1540 onwards, Henry VIII had no judges in his Privy Council. His son Edward VI and daughter Mary I did include judges on their own Privy Councils, but Elizabeth I excluded them for 40 years. Again, in contrast to today, with all most senior judges being members of the Judicial Committee of Privy Council.
On the face of it, the judiciary was becoming steadily more independent. By 1642, King Charles 1 was forced to agree to the appointment of judges “during good behaviour”, and their salaries were raised from under £200 to £1,000 a year in 1645. On the restoration of the monarchy in 1660, all judges, just 12 by that point, four in each of the common law courts, remained in office.
By 1668 the system of appointments “during pleasure” was reintroduced, and in the last 11 years of his reign Charles II sacked 11 of his judges. The next king, Charles’s brother James II, sacked 12 in just three years. This was bound to affect the quality of the judiciary: judges knew that their jobs were at risk if the sovereign did not like their judgments.
The solemn undertaking in law to Queen & Country to remain impartial
In 1868 the Promissory Oaths Act was made law, as it is today and all judges taking office must undertake to act in a constitutionally proper way, according to this law:
“I, , do swear that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the second in the office of ( ), and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affection or illwill. So help me God.”
“Without fear or favour, affection or ill-will, means just that. Today however, many of our judges have been acting with favour and ill-will, coerced by political or other third party interference to favour one side. Judges that breach their oaths are a fraud, for they purport to be something that they are not. A judge that breaches his or her oath, is no longer a judge and has no right to preside over cases. The issue is, however, that in the UK, the judges are a law unto themselves, they are completely unregulated and unaccountable.
The supremacy of the rule of law is our birthright
The birthright (privileges or possessions that a person has or is believed to be entitled to as soon as he is born) of Englishmen and women depends upon the supremacy of the rule of law, its observance and their right to control their laws. The right to self-determination under the rule of our own law is the very fabric of the liberty of our society. The rules of law and custom that determine that we have as a “birthright” our liberty are all the prerequisite duty of office to uphold and maintain. This is sworn to be upheld by those taking up any office under the Crown.
We the people have the right to determine whether a judge, or any one of us has broken the law, the oath of judicial office clearly being law, but the fact is, when it happens, there is no regulation nor enforcement of the law. Judges that breach their oaths in the UK go completely unpunished. The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office” (“JCIO”) does not deal with any allegation of bias, and its governors, the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice do nothing to regulate fellow members of their cabal.
Judicial corruption: Parliament’s powers to remove corrupt members of the judiciary
Both Houses of Parliament, the Commons and Lords have the power to petition The Queen for the removal of a judge of the High Court or the Court of Appeal. This power originates in the 1701 Act of Settlement and is now contained in section 11(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981. We, the people have the constitutional to petition The Queen when all else fails. This is a right of all civilians, exercised by petition to Parliament for an Order in Council to the Office of Privy Council. In our wide experience, all such applications to Privy Council have, at all times, been suppressed. The constitutional right has been subverted by the establishment, until now.
The power of Parliament to remove a judge has in fact only ever been exercised once, when Sir Jonah Barrington was removed from office as a judge of the Irish High Court of Admiralty in 1830 for corruption after having misappropriated funds due to a litigant. No English High Court or Court of Appeal judge has ever been removed from office under these powers. Circuit and District Judges can be removed by the Lord Chancellor, however, he can only do so if the Lord Chief Justice agrees. That will clearly never happen.
The problem we have today, is that both the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice cause of the problem, they fail to enforce the standards, because they lack integrity. The freemason culture, of “looking out for one’s brethren” prevails over the law and justice. They need to go with their fellow offenders, for real positive change to take place.
Judicial corruption: It’s time for action
All the judges we feature in our “hall of shame” have acted with favour and ill-will, under third party political coercion to prevent justice being served on corrupt corporations, lawyers and insolvency practitioners who widely abuse the system, using the courts as cash cows to feed often of the fruits of their own frauds.
It is we the people that can make a difference, so we, with your support, shall petition The Monarch, the House of Lord and Parliament to remove these purported judges, the state terrorists who have been inflicting their acts of tyranny on innocent parties in the name of justice, from our society, for the good of our country, our Constitution and all our future generations, so that nobody else has to suffer at the hands of a corrupt judiciary.
In the next article we shall be including a copy of our petition, which we ask to be spread far and wide.
We need your direct support in taking the petition to your Member of Parliament in your constituency, supporting us by pressing them to lobby Parliament to enforce this action. It will take less than 5-minutes, simply download our template, amend and send. Google the name of your MP to obtain their details.
Call for evidence of judicial corruption and fraud
If you or anyone you know has been affected by a corrupt judge or judicial wrongdoing, get in touch with us, we may be able to help.
Please email us with brief details, setting out how you believe the judge in question has behaved improperly and we will carry out an initial investigation. We must all unite to combat this wide ranging issue.
Help us to help you, please comment, like and share this article throughout social media.
Interesting article however, in the oath, you have printed Victoria II instead of Elizabeth II
Thanks for your feedback and well spotted. Although you are of course right, the law we quoted has not been amended to reflect the change in monarchy since 1868 but the judges have adopted it to correct the position when taking oath. gain, it shows the incompetence of the Law Ministers, who should have been onto that to change it when a new monarch takes oath.
Research shows that 95% of the judiciary are Freemasons. Freemasonry is wholly fraudulent. Any Freemason attaining the rank of master mason becomes a fraudster in that he takes on the persona of Hiram Abiff the son of a widow of Tyre, thereafter at any time uses the sign to indicate he is a master mason or above commits a fraud in “passing” himself off as the son of a widow, thus abusing the law in the Bible explicitly giving protection to widows and the sons of widows. “Cursed be they who pervert the judgment of widows, the fatherless and stranger.” In the book of Genesis chapter 33, is found the password to the Holy Royal Arch of freemasonry, and this defines the god to which Freemasons owe allegiance, contrary to the statements put out by various Freemasons that there is no Masonic god. The we read chapter 34 describing a particularly gruesome act of abuse of trust which is referred ton a “Right conduct” in the Masonic manuals.
You can add District Judge Paul M Brooks to that list. He is subject to multiple private investigations. His days as a Judge are limited. He was appointed by Jack (5 grand a day) Straw. Say no more!!!
Lovely reading a bit of truth. Yes it seems the fish rots from the head or pretty close.
I have been in a matter where I turned off a highway to set mt GpS – was sent a demand letter – I replied to say I had not parked, disputed their action — this was rejected and hiked the extortion by 60% … I was threatened with court but did not recieve any notice from said court, – only to find judgment had been taken by attournies further hijing the total ammount by hundred pound. Large matters get the headlines if unurthed , losts of small matters to the common man get a revolution!
as the romans said – Audi Alteram Parte, we have regressed !
You can add the President of the Employment Tribunal to your list: judge Barry Clarke.
He refuses to investigate any misconduct on the part of a judge except shouting and being sarcastic in a hearing, both of which are impossible to prove.
I have it in writing from him that dishonesty does not count as misconduct.
As your only option to complain about a judge in the employment tribunal is the president of the employment tribunal, it is impossible to complain about extreme bias, dishonesty, or corruption.
This seems to me to be evidence that the employment tribunal is fundamentally corrupt.
[You can add the judge I complained about to your list too – but I will email separately about that.]
We have spent decades trying to waken the public up about this to NO avail. The recent Depp case only highlights how NO jury courts trying cases involving DV claims and in particular divorce courts where innocent men are being smeared, framed and fleeced on the back of malicious lies conjured up by corrupt lawyers grooming ex wives to use malicious lies to steal men’s lives. Depp won in the USA before a JURY. Until judges can no longer preside over judgement of divorce cases and restore juries where major wealth is being redistributed into the hands of those who write the property contracts NO MAN is safe. Look on youtube for “Woman exposes the biggest threat to men globally” and “Family lawyer exposes the domestic violence racket corrupting our courts”
It’s not only judges who are corrupt but also solicitors, barristers, police, and others in a trusted high place.
Even the legal ombudsman is corrupt.
There seems to be no limit to how much
legal corruption goes on.
I know because I was the innocent victim of such all round corruption.
After I had unexpectedly lost my case in court one of those involved in my case even gloated on a social channel about himself, the court, my legal team, and the police all being corrupt.
I have evidence that the courts ignore the e perjury act, fraud act, national minimum wage act companies act, All to prevent send the barrister representing them to jail. The Barrister and solicitors ignored their principles in full knowledge. Then covered up for them. I have all the evidence to a criminal standard, beyond reasonable doubt. No solicitor will take it on as 3 barristers and 6 solicitors, 3 judges would require to be jailed for their actions.
Emily thormberry impersonated retired judge and falsely accused and evicted disabled person because they ask on the public funds they defraud. Clerkenswell and Shoreditch County Court is the most corrupt court in Islington and London, hina modah a Pakistani woman with severe complex on her ethnic origins has impersonated judge as Thornberrydvorders and brutalised, defrauded, and stole disabled person home. Thormberry, her arranged husband judge nugee, dairmuid ward, sadik Khan are reflecting themselves, marking ballots, anyone who doesn’t vote for them, thru attack. They bribed GPS, ccg, chemist, uclh, and killed people that asked on the fraud they commit. Billions are defrauded, housing for residents were sold privately and 5 left for tenants. Pocketing, defrauding and killing anyone in their way, manipulating, forging invoices, letters, steal money from residents support inbdwp, hmrc, bribed and even ombudsman is in this fraud. The Labour took over the Borough, is reform into Muslim ghetto, London name is khan’s land and thormberry that is diagnosed with schizophrenia and alcholoism is running the show. Ordering police to ignore reports, any report on crimes committed from Muslims is deleted, bribing courts, medics, schools to reject residents kids, stoppages of support, continuous extortion and penalties and even if you go to court another pakidtsnibwill pretend the judge or thormberry herself. The group of Labour troublemakers that attempt to destroy the country, bribed the former pm Johnson and they plot to destroy the UK. They import islamist, Africans, house them, gives them forged letters to deceive jomeboffice and gain citizenship and they use them as mules, pawns, transferee and blame accordingly. These corrupted Labour and their leader are destroying the country, manipulating the public, and work against the government. Hypocrites that defraud our taxes, public funds, budgets, and protest to remove suspicion and deceive the people. They must be stopped and burn on the stick. Thornverrys medical records and her are her lovers nugee, ward and stammer. Its alarming that with so much drugs, alcohol and diagnosis of schizophrenia these group of people try to take over the country. Many conservatives are bribed from labour and as Boris was. He received billions in his Turkish account to cause damages to the UK. The police is bribed, NHS, ombudsman, schools, hospitals, courts, judges, charities, individuals, companies, the sham housing associations and this group of pest must be eliminated. Thornverrys attacks reached the point of taking over the court, penalised defrauded disabled person and stole their home for her portfolio. How an mp and her husband that both earn less than 200thousand own more than 60million in estates and in their hidden accounts and under their fake names and passports more than 100mil. How?
I have had 19 years of the UK State abusing my human rights. These people don’t deserve to live. I cannot give you all this here because it included many judges, the DWP CCRC Bristol Courts, Admin Court. They falsify Court papers behind the scenes. The police will not investigate their crimes, Mps ignore your emails. All this propaganda about information rights is totally false. The Information Commissioner’s Office is all connected to this designed to cover up for the State.
I’m not a lawyer but I have acted as LiP. I’ve never succeeded in any hearing with a judge. For mixed reasons, some of which could be perceived as (low level) corruption. I’m autistic and have degrees in physics and psychology, and I’m studying for a maths degree. I think it’s more complicated than you are stating. As a Claimant you have to prove your case, you are “the attacker”, so the Courts protect those under “attack”, you might find your experience as a Defendant very different. Nonetheless, the Court process is very unsatisfactory with solicitors/barristers frequent deceit and abuse of process, and judges refusal to act on such deceit as evidence of corruption. There are various ways representatives (or indeed judges) can be difficult with no means to overturn these without considerable time and expense. I wonder if you are also autistic and your expectations are too high in terms of judges (who are almost all allistic) is too high? All allistics (judges or no) are cowards and will always chose the easiest option, likely to lead to the least criticisms. I don’t think that’s right (but I’m not allistic) but that is the world. Love to enter into some kind of conversation about this, especially how to fix things (or at least make them better).
My Employment Tribunal is possibly UK most ever Corrupt case.
Judge refuses to issue a judgement when Rule 62(3), doesn’t allow him to,
4 hearings was scheduled for public or changed to private at end of day.
The first Civil Double Jep (Merger) in Uk history, where NHS win costs twice on the exact same cause of action, which is of course extinguished by law by the first judgement and the NHS had no legal rights by law. Res Judicata.
They then create an Unless order I followed to the letter and then struck out, the law allows you to challenge an unless order strike out by a public hearing by law if you request in 14 days, despite that law, the judge refused with yet another Ultra Vires judgement. Corruption is out of hand
Barry Clarke and Hamish Marshall absolutely cover up judical misconduct between them.