The 7 Principles of Public Life underpins the Ministerial Code, providing the ethical code of conduct that all ministers, judges and public officials must observe.
Lord Nolan would be turning in his grave knowing how far departed from the standards today’s ministers, public officials and authorities have become.
It is the view of Intelligence UK International that the erosion and lack of regulation of the administrative laws, codes and standards is the biggest prevailing general issue.
The leadership lack integrity – The standards are not enforced
The regulatory framework is there, but regulators are simply not regulating. Having knowledge of administrative law and the duties on all public officials to act according to the Nolan Principles can, at least, assist the informed complainant in pressing for the standards to be complied with. Transparency / openness, accountability, integrity and honesty are generally the biggest deficits across the public and regulatory authorities.
The Committee on Standards in Public Life (CSPL) is an advisory non-departmental bureaucracy established in 1994 to advise the Prime Minister on ethical standards of public life. It promotes a code of conduct known as the 7 Principles of Public Life, also named the Nolan principles after the first chairman of the committee, Lord Michael Nolan, who devised the code. It promotes, but fails to regulate, that is the issue.
The 7 principles of public life must be adhered to by anyone who works as a public office-holder. This includes people who are elected or appointed to public office, nationally and locally, and all people appointed to work in:
- the civil service
- local government
- the police
- the courts and probation services
- non-departmental public bodies
- health, education, social and care services
The principles also apply to all those in other sectors that deliver public services and those principles we implemented to prevent the public from abuse from public authorities and their officers. It is the lack of enforcement and the willful failings of the only regulator, or should we say, the absence of any independent regulator to enforce the standards that paves the way for widespread office holder misfeasance and unaccountable public authorities.
Those failings in turn creates the path for widespread lack of accountability, honesty, integrity, compromising the standards within those public authorities and the sectors they purport to regulate.
The 7 principles of public life, listed below, are well devised and if implemented, would curb much of the gross malfeasance that runs rife in the public authorities that purport to act in the public interest:
The 7 Principles of public Life / Nolan Principles
Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest.
Holders of public office must avoid placing themselves under any obligation to people or organisations that might try inappropriately to influence them in their work. They should not act or take decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or their friends. They must declare and resolve any interests and relationships.
Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias.
Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.
Holders of public office should act and take decisions in an open and transparent manner. Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing.
Holders of public office should be truthful.
Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behavior. They should actively promote and robustly support the principles and be willing to challenge poor behavior wherever it occurs.