The tyranny of Newcastle Crown Court lies by Judge Prince
November 10, 2025
High Court’s Chief ICC Judge Briggs treacherous fraud exposed
November 15, 2025
ICC Judge Barber, AKA Sally Barber, formerly known as Registrar Barber is not in fact a Judge, as in a judge of the High Court, but a Registrar (Master) of the High Court of Chancery, specialising in insolvency and companies law cases. ‘ICC’ stands for ‘Insolvency & Companies Court’, based at the Royal Courts of Justice, Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London.
In this short real-evidence based article we expose how ICC Judge Barber impermissibly trespassed on a case that was in the exclusive jurisdiction of a High Court Judge, to defeat the Claimant, and the High Court Judge’s order, in a fraud case, by winding up / liquidating the applicant in fraudulent insolvency proceedings, without any debt, to defraud the victim of over £650,000!
Life changing sums of money, hoodwinked in less than 10-minutes, in absence of law by ICC Judge Barber and her associate barrister, Ulick Staunton.
We tell it for the ordinary man or woman down the pub, everyone can get it. We show you, in simple speak, that those entrusted to administer justice in the UK, are unworthy of the positions they hold. Unregulated, lawless and out of control? You decide.
We’re not trying to discriminate against ICC Judge Barber by saying that she is a danger to the public, although that is factual.
We’re not trying to single any of them out, that wouldn’t be fair. Chief ICCJ Briggs, the Master of the Rolls, head of Civil Justice for England and Wales, and many other senior judicial subjects, are likewise.
Treasonous conduct exhibited by a sect of judicial transgressors who walk all over their official oaths? We’d be doing our country and our people real injustice not to fully expose their tyranny.
Judges can also pervert the course of justice ‘no one is above the law’
In sentencing David McLuckie, the former Cleveland Police Chairman for perverting for bypassing the law over a summary driving points offence…
Judge, Constance Briscoe is jailed for 16-months for perverting the course of public justice. ‘No one is above the law’
Where McLuckie and Briscoe were concerned, there wasn’t hundreds of thousands of pounds of fraud involved like there is here.
In this case, ICC Judge Barber was perpetrator of the fraud, dishonestly depriving EEI of the statutory set off rights to make gains and to have caused loss is fraud, as it is, an act without jurisdiction.
Failure to comply with the mandatory statutory requirement, when the rule is engaged, can only result in a nullity and, ‘there’s not varying degrees of nullity’.
If an act is void, it’s automatically void and everything founded by it is also void.
Insolvency law requires that when there are claims arising through pre-insolvency mutual dealings between the insolvent and a creditor, or one claiming to prove, the sums due from one, must be set off against sums due from the other. (See: R.14.25 Insolvency (England & Wales) Rules 2016; Stein v Blake [1995] UKHL 11 & Bresco Electrical Services Ltd v Michael J Lonsdale [2020] UKSC 25).
In 2020, the Supreme Court in Bresco put it this way:
P.29…whereas legal or equitable set-off is essentially optional, taking effect only if the cross-claim is pleaded as a defence to the claim, insolvency set-off is mandatory, and takes effect upon the commencement of the insolvency (the “cut-off date”). It is said to be self-executing, and for some purposes the original cross-claims are replaced by a single claim for the balance: see IR 14.25(3) and (4).
P.30. The identification of the net balance is to be ascertained by the taking of an account: see IR 14.25(2). If there is no dispute as to the existence and amount of the claims and cross-claims this is in practice a matter of simple arithmetic, the net balance being the difference between the aggregate of the claims and the aggregate of the cross-claims. But if any of the claims and cross-claims are in dispute, then those disputes will need first to be resolved, by reference to the individual merits of each, before the arithmetic resumes: see again Stein v Blake (supra) per Lord Hoffmann at 255E-G.”
In 2022 this Firm acquired the high profile case from Mr Millinder, who we allege to be the victim of a protracted malicious campaign of abuse by the English judiciary over 7-years.
We show you all how a sect of ‘judges’ evaded the law, then concealed the crucial evidence and facts to prevent justice being served on the Defendants and themselves.
Earth Energy Investments LLP (‘EEI‘) was Mr Millinder’s investment sole purpose vehicle along with its subsidiary, Empowering Wind MFC Ltd (‘EW‘).
Both companies have pre-liquidation claims against Middlesbrough Football Club arising from contractual dealings.
Empowering Wind MFC Ltd (EW) owned by Earth Energy Investments LLP (‘EEI) were to have ‘constructed, connected to the grid and operated’ ‘Europe’s first wind powered football stadium’ until the Club refused the connection, leaving the firm with huge losses
The Club defeated the contractual purpose on 30 April 2015, by refusing EW the connection on the finalised terms of the Connection Offer that was already agreed and completed by 4 January 2013.
The contractual purpose was to ‘construct, connect to the grid and operate‘ a 90 metre high wind turbine at the Stadium. Without the connection, the turbine cannot operate.
Chronology of events
On 25 June 2015 the Club demanded money from EW; £75,000 rent and £181,269.89 energy supply (£256,269.89).
On 29 June 2015 the Board of EW assigned the investment made in taking its development project to a construction ready phase to EEI.
On 19 August 2015 the Club forfeited the lease. The claims against the Club vested in EW and EEI arise from that.
On 19 September 2016, EW was wound up when the Club falsely claimed to be creditors in the sum of £256,269.89.
The then Chief Registrar, avoided the mandatory law on set off, failing in his duty to have set off the EW claim substantially exceeding the Club’s claim, as the law required. That was EW out of the way for the Club, the rules of the game, never figured.
Then it was onto EEI, with ICC Judge Barber playing offside in absence of the rules of the game.
On 6 January 2017 EEI served the Club a statutory demand for £530,000, comprising of the assigned investment made in EW thrown away when the Club forfeited the lease it was paid £200,000 for by EW.
On 9 January 2017, the Club attended a without notice (ex-parte) financial injunction hearing to ‘refrain presentation of the EEI demand’.
On 16 January 2017 the injunction was disposed of, with an order, said to have been by consent, but disposed by EEI, awarding the Club £25,000.
It was later found by Mr Justice Nugee on 5 February 2018 that the Club had withheld material information to conceal the important facts and evidence proving the EEI demand. It was found that the Club withheld the assignment on which the demand was based.
The course of justice was defeated, and here’s how they did it..
The Middlesbrough Football Club winding up petition
On 12 February 2018, Middlesbrough Football Club and their lawyers appear to have been given a license to ‘bypass’ / avoid the law and justice by the English judicial establishment.
Acting to affront and defeat the mandatory engaged rule on insolvency set off, on 12 February 2018, the Club presented a winding up petition against EEI.
On 1 March 2018 EEI applied to set aside the consent order on the grounds that he was alleged to have been founded by fraud and that in any event, the EEI claim set off the Club’s £25,000.
On 20 March 2018 the Club and their lawyers applied to Mr Justice Nugee to strike out EEI’s application to set aside the £25,000 purported winding up petition debt originating by their order of 16 January 2017.
The High Court Judge’s order of 21 March 2018
Just 6-days later ICC Judge Barber came in to defeat the High Court Judge’s order
ICC Judge Barber has a long affiliation with barrister, Ulick Staunton, acting for the Club.
What happened was rather than to have acted in the interests of justice and withdrawn the abuse of process petition, it appears that ICC Judge Barber conspired with Ulick Staunton, the Club and their lawyers, Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP in Newcastle, to defeat the Judge’s order to avoid a trial of the application to set aside the £25,000 order that EEI alleged was founded by fraud.
Earth Energy Investments LLP’s authorised representative was taken ill – The 27 March 2018 sealed letter
On 27 March 2018 EEI filed the letter we exhibit below, it was sealed by ICC Judge Barber and her Court, affirming that the letter was read.
The letter expressly referred to the High Court Judge’s order of 21 March 2018 and the fraud proceedings listed for trial relating to alleged material non-disclosure during without notice financial injunction proceedings, and alleged blackmail by the Club, also arising from the same order, 16 January 2017.
It cannot be said that ICC Judge Barber, Mr Staunton, the Club and their co-defendants did not know on 28 March 2018 that their purported £25,000 winding up petition was a flagrant abuse of process.
In two-tier justice England, the laws and even the High Court Judge’s order, mattered not, not where ICC Judge Barber and the Club were concerned, they were going in for the kill, without jurisdiction in absence of law.
No Judge acting properly could possibly have contemplated making a winding up order on 28 March 2018 knowing that there is a High Court Judge’s order of 21 March 2018 listing EEI’s case to set aside the alleged petition debt for a hearing – ICC Judge Barber did it anyway !
On 12 November 2018, after having falsely claimed to be creditors of EEI’s subsidiary, making spurious claims of £256,269.89, £541,308.89 and £4,111,874.75 to the Official Receiver, Ulick ‘U-turned’ on the claims at paragraph 37 of his skeleton argument before the then Chancellor of the High Court, Vos, prior to Sir Geoffrey Vos lying in his judgment saying that the claim Ulick U-turned on was a ‘quantified claim for rent‘ knowing that no rent was owed and that £181,269.89 of it was an invoice for energy supply!
On 28 March 2018, acting on her own whim, ICC Judge Barber acted as an agent for the Club, working with Ulick Staunton the obviously dishonest barrister to defeat not only the statutory law and the Claimant to evade justice, but the High Court Judge’s order at the same time!
“Rs do not bring any claim against A, or Empowering or Earth Energy, save that Rs claim £25,000 from Earth Energy under the consent order of 16 January 2017.”
– Paragraph 37 of Mr Staunton’s skeleton for the Club, dated 12 November 2018.
ICC Judge Barber wound up EEI so that the cause of action it was taking against the Club, and two-days prior, against the Club and the Official Receiver, fell back into the hands of the Official Receiver.
What jurisdiction did a Master / junior judge have to knowingly defeat a High Court Judge’s order, just pretending it did not exist?
On 12 February 2018 the EEI claim of its demand plus statutory commercial rate interest was over £650,000!
The Club had no petition debt, so they, assisted by the ‘judge who deliberately did not judge’ Sally Barber, evaded the law, to ensure the Club and their cohorts evaded justice.
Below we exhibit the 5-page official transcript of the rigged proceeding by ICC Judge Barber in absence of EEI, law and justice.
The official 28 March 2018 transcript
21___Transcript_Barber_28_03_2018
They all remain at large for in the UK, two-tier justice prevails and many are made ‘above the law‘
What would the ordinary man or woman down the pub think?
Invitation to comment
ICC Judge Barber, Chief ICC Judge Briggs, and the new Chancellor of the High Court, Lord Justice Birss, who is responsible for the conduct of the High Court Judges and ICC Judges of the Court of Chancery, have been invited to comment.
Help us to help you, share widely, and please consider a donation to our fighting fund.
Comments please.
8 Comments
Most judges in Britain are Freemasons and therefore involved in fraud and therefore not eligible to be judges. The first fraud; when a person is “raised” to the degree of Master Mason (3rd degree) he goes through a ceremony known as necromancy; that of being raised from the dead. He has now become the son of a widow they call Hiram Abiff and is imparted with knowledge, signs, symbols and words by which to convey to other Masons his stature and by which means to demand assistance “whether he be right or wrong”. He is told that he is now above all Earthly matters including the law, the premise being that there is no right or wrong, both exist in equity as black and white. To protect their brothers they will manipulate the law, destroy evidence, manufacture false evidence and even hold sessions out of court and without recording. Freemasonry is a wholly Jewish construct designed to deny justice to the Gentiles. :- https://www.dropbox.com/s/46ivz0y7p8rlzl3/MASTERS%20OF%20TRUTH%20FATHERS%20OF%20LIES.pdf?dl=0
Dear Alison,
Much of what you say resonates with our findings across so many cases and of the 35 subjects we describe as ‘judicial transgressors’ of our ‘Operation Blackjack’ investigation, the vast majority (90%) are of the sect you descibe who we have reason to believe are Zionists (Jewish extremists – as in the 2024 Government definition on extremism). The actual bias, dishonest concealment and false statements made by senior judges who had knowledge of fact and circumstance is out of control and off the scale. We will study the link to the documents you have provided.
Many thanks.
Best wishes,
INTELLIGENCE UK INVESTIGATIONS
I can definitely reasonate with this article.
I have been subjected to judicial abuse, harassment, intimidation, retaliation by the judiciary simply for raising legitimate concerns of judicial misconduct, retaliation, mysgony and I am facing a RPO by the AG in a public hearing in December 2025 in public which is was listed despite providing dates to advoid.
They are trying to silence me permanently.
Many thanks for your input Sandra and sorry to hear of your difficulties. As you probably know, you are one of literally thousands affected by the rogue sect of judges of England & Wales. There’s a cure for corruption and that is, transparency. They must be stopped.
Yes and I look forward to hearing from you in regards to helping me defend this malicious application which is premeditated since November 2024.
Keep the good work. Great inspiration
Keep the good work. Great inspiration
Looking forward to hearing from you soon
[…] our previous article we exposed ICC Barber who, acting without jurisdiction on 28 March 2018 committed acts described in law as being […]
[…] (now Lord Justice Arnold), Mr Justice Nugee (now Lord Justice Nugee), Chief ICC Judge Briggs, ICC Judge Barber and HHJ Philip Mark Pelling in a protracted and severe affront to […]