The tyranny of Newcastle Crown Court lies by Judge Prince
November 10, 2025
ICC Judge Barber a danger to the public
ICC Judge Barber, AKA Sally Barber, formerly known as Registrar Barber is not in fact a Judge, as in a judge of the High Court, but a Registrar (Master) of the specialist division of the High Court of Chancery specialising in insolvency and companies law cases. ‘ICC’ stands for ‘Insolvency & Companies Court’, based at the Royal Courts of Justice, Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London.
We’re not trying to discriminate against ICC Judge Barber by saying that she is a danger to the public, although that is factual.
We’re not trying to single any of them out, that wouldn’t be fair. Chief ICCJ Briggs, the Master of the Rolls, head of Civil Justice for England and Wales, and many other senior judicial subjects, are likewise. It is treasonous conduct from a sect of judicial transgressors we’ve investigated who walk all over their official oaths these days, and we’d be doing an injustice not to fully expose them.
Judges can also pervert the course of justice ‘no one is above the law’
In sentencing David McLuckie, the former Cleveland Police Chairman for perverting the course of public justice for bypassing the law over a summary driving points offence, HH Judge Wood in Newcastle Crown Court said this:
“This case is not really about penalty points, it’s about justice and equality before the law. You are not entitled to avoid the law or interfere with the course of justice“
The case of Middlesbrough Football Club v Earth Energy Investments LLP (and vice versa)
It’s about *insolvency law, that requires that when there are claims arising through mutual dealings between the insolvent and a creditor, or one claiming to prove, the sums due from one, must be set off against sums due from the other. (See: R.14.25 Insolvency (England & Wales) Rules 2016; Stein v Blake [1995] UKHL 11 & Bresco Electrical Services Ltd v Michael J Lonsdale [2020] UKSC 25)
In 2022 this Firm acquired the high profile case from Mr Millinder, who we allege to be the victim of a protracted malicious campaign of abuse by the English judiciary over 7-years.
Earth Energy Investments LLP (‘EEI‘) was Mr Millinder’s investment sole purpose vehicle along with its subsidiary, Empowering Wind MFC Ltd (‘EW‘). Both companies have pre-liquidation claims against Middlesbrough Football Club arising from contractual dealings with the Club.
The Club defeated the contractual purpose on 30 April 2015, by refusing EW the connection on the finalised terms of the Connection Offer that was already agreed and completed by 4 January 2013. The contractual purpose was to ‘construct, connect to the grid and operate‘ a 90 metre high wind turbine at the Stadium.
Chronology of events
On 25 June 2015 the Club demanded money, £75,000 rent and £181,269.89 energy supply (£256,269.89).
On 29 June 2015 the Board of EW assigned the investment made in taking its development project to a construction ready phase to EEI.
On 19 August 2015 the Club forfeited the lease. The claims against the Club vested in EW and EEI arise from that.
On 19 September 2016, EW was wound up when the Club falsely claimed to be creditors in the sum of £256,269.89.
The then Chief Registrar, bypassed the mandatory law on set off, failing in his duty to have set off the EW claim substantially exceeding the Club’s claim, as the law required. That was EW out of the way for the Club, the rules of the game, never figured. Then it was onto EEI.
On 6 January 2017 EEI served the Club a statutory demand for £530,000, the assigned investment made in EW thrown away when the Club forfeited the lease that it had been paid £200,000 for by EW.
On 9 January 2017, the Club attended a without notice (ex-parte) financial injunction hearing to ‘refrain presentation of the EEI demand’.
On 16 January 2017 the injunction was disposed of, with an order, said to have been by consent, but disposed by EEI, awarding the Club £25,000.
It was later found by Mr Justice Nugee on 5 February 2018 that the Club had withheld material information to conceal the important facts and evidence proving the EEI demand.
The Middlesbrough Football Club winding up petition
On 12 February 2018, Middlesbrough Football Club and their lawyers appear to have been given a license to ‘bypass / avoid the law and justice by the English judicial establishment.
Acting to affront the mandatory engaged rule on insolvency set off, on 12 February 2018, the Club presented a winding up petition against EEI.
On 1 March 2018 EEI applied to set aside the consent order on the grounds that he was alleged to have been founded by fraud and that in any event, the EEI claim set off the Club’s £25,000.
On 20 March 2018 the Club and their lawyers applied to Mr Justice Nugee to strike out EEI’s application to set aside the £25,000 purported winding up petition debt originating by their order of 16 January 2017.
The High Court Judge’s order of 21 March 2018
Just 6-days later ICC Judge Barber came in to defeat the High Court Judge’s order
ICC Judge Barber has a long affiliation with barrister, Ulick Staunton, acting for the Club.
What happened was rather than to have acted in the interests of justice and withdrawn the abuse of process petition, it appears that ICC Judge Barber conspired with Ulick Staunton, the Club and their lawyers, Womble Bond Dickinson (UK) LLP in Newcastle, to defeat the Judge’s order to avoid a trial of the application to set aside the £25,000 order that EEI alleged was founded by fraud.
On 12 November 2018, after having falsely claimed to be creditors of EEI’s subsidiary, making spurious claims of £256,269.89, £541,308.89 and £4,111,874.75 to the Official Receiver, Ulick ‘U-turned’ on the claims at paragraph 37 of his skeleton argument before the then Chancellor of the High Court, Vos, prior to Sir Geoffrey Vos lying in his judgment saying that the claim Ulick U-turned on was a ‘quantified claim for rent‘ knowing that no rent was owed and that £181,269.89 of it was an invoice for energy supply!
Honourable, they say?
“Rs do not bring any claim against A, or Empowering or Earth Energy, save that Rs claim £25,000 from Earth Energy under the consent order of 16 January 2017.”
On 28 March 2018, acting on her own whim with the Club, Mr Staunton and Womble Bond Dickinson Solicitors in Newcastle, they defeated not only the statutory law and the Claimant in the case against them to evade justice, but the High Court Judge’s order at the same time!
ICC Judge Barber wound up EEI so that the cause of action it was taking against the Club, and two-days prior, against the Club and the Official Receiver, fell back into the hands of the Official Receiver.
What jurisdiction did a Master / junior judge have to knowingly defeat a High Court Judge’s order, just pretending it did not exist?
On 12 February 2018 the EEI claim of its demand plus statutory commercial rate interest was over £650,000!
The Club had no petition debt, so they bypassed the law, to evade justice.
They all remain at large for in the UK, two-tier justice prevails and many are made ‘above the law‘
What would the ordinary man or woman down the pub think?
Comments please.
Help us to help you, share widely, and please consider a donation to our fighting fund.
